Current Responses

  • Professor Dr. Mohammad Tariqur Rahman on Happy birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Regret on Delighted birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Lee Rudolph on Drug scientists trip up, raising meth paper to compose one on LSD

We’re on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Pleased birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine

Nine years back this Saturday that is coming August 3, 2010, we published a post, “Why write a web log about retractions?”

Exactly What is becoming clear when you look at the intervening nine years is exactly what a vein that is rich are as stories of what goes on whenever one thing goes incorrect in science. And also as we’ve done each year at the moment, we’ll review just just what took place within the last one year.

Share this:

Drug researchers trip up, raising meth paper to compose one on LSD

Evidently meth is really a gateway medication … for publishing misconduct.

Scientists in Asia have actually lost a 2019 paper as to how LSD could harm vision because they’d lifted most of the we do your essays paper from articles which had showed up the season before in yet another log — about methamphetamine.

The retracted article, “Long-term systemic therapy with lysergic acid diethylamide causes retinal harm in CD1 mice,” starred in Human & Experimental Toxicology. Based on the article:

Share this:

Writers object as “doubtful” information doom dermatology paper

A dermatology log has retracted a 2017 article by a set of scientists in Saudi Arabia after getting a complaint that is“serious about the integrity associated with the information. However the very first writer of the paper pressed straight straight straight back, saying the move ended up being unjustified.

This article, “Successful usage of mixed corticosteroids and rituximab in an individual with refractory cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa,” had been published by Ibrahim Al-Homood and Mohammad Aljahlan, rheumatologists at King Fahad health City in Riyadh and starred in the Journal of Dermatology & Dermatologic operation. It described (with instead grisly photos) the situation of the man that is 25-year-old serious leg ulcers that fixed after the described combination treatment.

But during the notice describes, the paper can’t be trusted:

Share this:

Kyoto University suspends very first author of retracted Kumamoto quake paper

The initial composer of a paper that is now-retracted technology in regards to the outcomes of the life-threatening 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in Japan was suspended from their college place for starters year.

Intending Lin, associated with Department of Geophysics at Kyoto University, had been sanctioned because of the institution for misconduct stemming from their abuse of information and plagiarism when you look at the 2016 paper:

Share this:

Sunday reads: A sleuth whoever work has generated a huge selection of retractions and modifications; an “unethical, high-risk and deceptive eye that is; genetics’ high retraction price

Before we provide this week’s sunday Reads, a concern: Do you realy enjoy our weekly roundup? In that case, we’re able to actually make use of your assistance. Can you think about a donation that is tax-deductible help sunday Reads, and our day to day work? Many Thanks ahead of time.

Share this:

Forensics Friday: can you flag this paper if it had been under review?

Ever desired to hone your abilities being a sleuth that is scientific? Now’s your possibility.

As a result of the United states Society for Biochemistry and Biology that is molecular(, which can be dedicated to educating writers on guidelines in publishing, figure planning, and reproducibility, we’re presenting the tenth in a set, Forensics Friday.

Have a look at the image below, and then simply just take our poll. From then on, go through the website link below to discover the right response.

Share this:

Cock and bull tale contributes to retraction of bovine herpesvirus paper

The ancients possessed a plain thing for hybrids (think pets, perhaps perhaps perhaps not automobiles): half goat-half people, horses with individual torsos, winged horses and lions, you will get the image. But a mix that is chicken-cown’t on that list … until now.

A team of researchers in Brazil has lost a paper in a journal that is veterinary wanting to reuse information from a chicken research within their paper on herpesvirus infections in cattle.

The content, “Bovine Herpesvirus 5 promotes dysfunction that is mitochondrial cultured bovine monocyte-derived macrophages and never impact virus replication,” appeared in February within the journal Veterinary Microbiology.

Share this:

‘Not biologically plausible’: questions about survey information make fluorosis paper a flag

A article that is recent offered a stark caution in regards to the dangers to kiddies of fluoride within the nation’s water happens to be tagged with a manifestation of concern following the book of a unique paper which undermines the dependability associated with initial information.

This article, “Dental fluorosis trends in US oral health studies: 1986 to 2012,” appeared in March in JDR Clinical & Translational analysis, a journal that is dental. The very first writer on the paper is Christopher Neurath, regarding the United states Environmental wellness Studies Project, which advocates against fluoridation of water.

The content, that used information through the nationwide health insurance and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for the years 2011 and 2012, reported “large increases in extent and prevalence” of fluorosis over that period — continuing a trend dating back to towards the mid-1980s.

In line with the scientists:

Share this:

Gravitational industries, silkworm excrement, and “putor” programs: just exactly How did this “pure, utter nonsense” get into in a journal that is peer-reviewed?

Often, a paper arrives this is certainly therefore revolutionary, it defies description. Therefore versus you will need to do justice to a paper that is recent Parasitology Research, we’ll replicate a couple of paragraphs right right here:

Share this:

Leech paper nets phrase of concern

A write-up claiming to uproot the tree that is evolutionary of has gotten a manifestation of concern after having a audience notified the log about prospective issues with the information.

The content, “Phylogenomic analysis of the putative link that is missing reinterpretation of leech development,” appeared online in Genome Biology and Evolution, an Oxford University Press name, on June 19 with this 12 months. Based on the writers — a worldwide team that includes researchers during the nationwide Museum of Natural History, the new york Museum of Natural Sciences, Florida State University and University of Gothenburg in Sweden — their results:


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>